Following the recent JES appeal process, we can confirm that the DASO role has now been evaluated at Band 4.
We recognise that this will be welcome news for those in the role and reflects the evidence submitted through the appeal process regarding the scope, complexity and responsibilities of the post.
We are mindful that not all roles undergoing JES review or appeal have resulted in similar outcomes. We know this continues to be a source of frustration and concern for many members, and we remain committed to supporting all colleagues through ongoing JES processes to ensure fairness, transparency and consistency.
If you have any questions about your own role or appeal, please contact your local representative for advice and support.
JES Appeal Outcome – DASO Role
Myth 1: This means DASOs have been given a “pay rise.”
Fact: JES is a job evaluation scheme. It assesses the role – not the person. The appeal outcome means the evaluated banding of the role has changed to Band 4. It is not a discretionary pay award or bonus.
Myth 2: This means DASO roles are “more important” than other roles.
Fact: JES does not rank roles by importance or worth. It measures factors such as responsibility, decision-making, complexity and impact. Different roles can score differently without one being “more valuable” than another.
Myth 3: If one role has moved band, all similar roles will automatically move.
Fact: JES decisions are based on the specific evidence submitted about a particular role. Other roles would need to go through their own review or appeal process with supporting evidence.
Myth 4: This closes the door on other appeals.
Fact: It does not. Members in other roles still have the right to seek advice and pursue appeals where there is evidence that factors have not been properly assessed.
Myth 5: Napo is only focusing on one group of members.
Fact: Napo supports fairness and consistency across all roles. Where evidence supports a case, we will back it. We are equally aware that many members have not seen positive outcomes and we continue to challenge inconsistencies in the wider JES process.
What This Outcome Does Mean
- The DASO role has been evaluated at Band 4 following appeal.
- The decision reflects the evidence presented about the scope and responsibilities of that role.
- It reinforces the importance of robust, well-evidenced appeals.
What It Doesn’t Mean
- It is not a general pay award.
- It is not a comparison exercise between roles.
- It does not prevent other roles from seeking review.
Napo is continuing to engage with the employers in respect of the ongoing review of all roles